Momolu V.S. SIRLEAF, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie PEARSON, sued individually and in official capacity; Jarratt, Colonel, sued individually and in official capacity, Defendants-Appellees, 697 F. App'x 221

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sirleaf v. Pearson, No. 3:15-cv-00301-MHL-RCY, 2017 WL 655173 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED