Raymond GIUFFRIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELLSOUTH TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, 139 F. App'x 637

PER CURIAM: Raymond Giuffria appeals following the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to the defendant in this civil action. Giuffria alleged in his complaint that Bell-south committed fraud by billing him for America Online (“AOL”) services to which he did not subscribe. “This court reviews a district court’s grant of

summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standards as the district court.” Am. Home Assurance Co. v. United Space Alliance, LLC, 378 F.3d 482, 486 (5th Cir.2004). Giuffria argues that the bills BellSouth sent to him were fraudulent. However, he fails to show a genuine issue of material fact with respect to the elements for a cause of action for fraud, and his largely conclusional brief is insufficient to meet his

summary judgment burden. See Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir.1994)(en banc); see also Guidry v. United States Tobacco Co., Inc., 188 F.3d 619, 627 (5th Cir.1999). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.