UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stacy Payne WATKINS, also known as Stacy Bernard, also known as Stacy Payne, Defendant-Appellant, 147 F. App'x 429

PER CURIAM: Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Stacy Payne Watkins raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43, — L.Ed.2d - (2005), and its progeny, which held that unpreserved claims based on United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), are reviewed for plain error. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.