GENERAL COOLING & HEATING CORPORATION v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION, 152 F.2d 655

WALLER, Circuit Judge. The facts in this case are fully set out in the opinion of the lower Court in 59 F. Supp. 357, as well as the reasons of the District Judge for dismissing the complaint. We agree with the lower Court that the Murray-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A., Sec, 606b — 3 (a), merely authorized, but did not require, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to make loans and purchases of rationed commodities. The judgment is affirmed.