Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: 1911-11-27
Jurisdiction: United States
Docket: No. 2,170
Citation: 190 F. 1020
Opinion
PER CURIAM. On the evidence in this case it is clear that the appellant is not a late arrival in this country, but has been in the country many years, and we find nothing in the record to dispute the uncontradicted evidence that he was born in this country at the time and place claimed. See Gee Cus Beng v. United States, 184 Fed. 383, 106 C. C. A. 493. The decree of the District Court is therefore reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to discharge the appellant