UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fabian MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant, 205 F. App'x 254

PER CURIAM: Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Fabian Martinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Austin, 432 F.3d 598, 599-600 (5th Cir.2005), which held that the application of the remedial opinion of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), to a sentencing hearing where the underlying offense was committed pre-Booker does not violate constitutional due process or ex post facto requirements. In light of the foregoing, we assume, arguendo only, that the appeal waiver does not bar the instant appeal. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.