UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo ACEVEDO-QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant, 231 F. App'x 401

PER CURIAM: The attorney appointed to represent Arturo Acevedo-Quintero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Acevedo-Quintero has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and AcevedoQuintero’s response demonstrates that there is no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Acevedo-Quintero’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.