UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy G. DRISCOLL, Defendant-Appellant, 233 F. App'x 388

PER CURIAM: The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roy G. Driscoll has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Driscoll has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Driscoll’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Driscoll’s response discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.