UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael Eduardo BARAHONA-LAZO, also known as Rafael Eduardo Barahona, Defendant-Appellant, 234 F. App'x 300

PER CURIAM: Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rafael Eduardo Barahona-Lazo raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.