UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Derrick Anthony SARDIN, also known as Xavier James Sardin, Defendant-Appellant, 249 F. App'x 378

PER CURIAM: Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Derrick Anthony Sardin raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Beydoun, 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir.2006), which held that there is no Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004) violation when hearsay testimony is used at sentencing, rather than at trial. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.