UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose Armando CADENA-DIAZ, also known as Armando Diaz, also known as Jesus Roel Cadena-Diaz, also known as Joel Frausto Jr, also known as Aztlan Jesus Garcia Jr., Defendant-Appellant, 256 F. App'x 698

PER CURIAM: Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Armando Cadena-Diaz raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.