UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael Terrance PRATHER, Defendant-Appellant, 312 F. App'x 705

PER CURIAM: Michael Terrance Prather pleaded guilty to a single count indictment charging him with being a felon in possession of two Ruger firearms. Prather has appealed his sentence, contending that the district court erred by denying the Government’s motion to reduce his offense level by one level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(b). Prather contends that the district court did not have the discretion to deny the reduction under the circumstances of this case.

Because Prather’s arguments in the district court were not sufficient to put the district court on notice of the basis of the argument he has raised on appeal, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Duhon, 541 F.3d 391, 396 (5th Cir.2008). Although we have concluded that the district court committed a clear or obvious error, see United States v. Outlaw, 319 F.3d 701, 705-09 (5th Cir.2003), and United States v. Tello, 9 F.3d 1119, 1123-28 (5th Cir.1993), and that Prather’s substantial rights were affected, see United States v.

Price, 516 F.3d 285, 289 (5th Cir.2008), we decline to exercise our discretion to correct the error because the error did not affect the fairness or integrity of the judicial proceedings in light of Prather’s obstruction of justice. See Du- hon, 541 F.3d at 396. The judgment is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under dan limited circumstances set forth in 5m Cir. R. 47.5.4.