UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Melvin WIAND, Defendant-Appellant, 381 F. App'x 450

PER CURIAM: The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Melvin Wiand has filed a motion seeking leave to withdraw together with a supporting brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Wiand has filed a response.

The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Wiand’s contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel; such assertions generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Wiand’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, his counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, his counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and his appeal is DISMISSED. . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.