UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Marco Antonio NUNEZ-RODEA, Defendant-Appellant, 383 F. App'x 400

PER CURIAM: The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Antonio Nunez-Rodea has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Nunez-Rodea has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Moreover, Nunez-Rodea’s removal from the United States rendered moot any issues as to his sentence. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.2007).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.