UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose HINOJOSA, also known as Joe Anthony Hinojosa, Defendant-Appellant, 384 F. App'x 324

PER CURIAM: Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Hinojosa presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir.2001) (rejecting Commerce Clause-based challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)); United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir.1999) (same); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir.1996) (same). The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.