UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Roberto MINOR, also known as Robert Minor, Defendant-Appellant, 471 F. App'x 320

PER CURIAM: The attorney appointed to represent Roberto Minor has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Minor has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Minor’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein. Minor’s motion for leave to file a supplement to his pro se response to counsel’s initial brief in this matter is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.