UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos HURTADO-VALOIS, Defendant-Appellant, 471 F. App'x 385

PER CURIAM: The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Hurtado-Valois has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Hurtado-Valois has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hurtado-Valois’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment with respect to the statute of conviction cited for count five. The judgment should be corrected to reflect that Hurtado-Valois was convicted of illegal entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325. See Fed.R.CrimP. 36. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for correction of the clerical error pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. Pursuant to 5th Cir.

R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.