Laura Estela SALAZAR-REGINO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.M. TROMINSKI, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees; Teodulo Cantu-Delgadillo, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.M. Trominski, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees; Daniel Carrizales-Perez, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aaron Cabrera, Acting Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Acting Director HLG/DO; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees; Manuel Sandoval-Herrera, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aaron Cabrera, Acting Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees; Raul Hernandez Pantoja, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States; Charles Arendale, Acting Director; Respondents-Appellees; Jose Martin Oviedo-Sifuentes, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles Arendale, Acting Director; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees; Cesar Lucio, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles Arendale, Acting Director; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees; Praxedis Rodriguez, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aaron Cabrera; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees; Nohemi Rangel-Rivera, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aaron Cabrera; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees, 479 F.3d 362

PER CURIAM: In Salazar-Regino v. Moore, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 827, 166 L.Ed.2d 660 (2006), the Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, and this court’s opinion, Salazar-Regino v. Trominski, 415 F.3d 436 (5th Cir.2005), was vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006). We have invited the parties to submit letters stating what action they wish this court to take on remand. We are in agreement with the joint request of the parties and therefore direct the following: As to petitioner Jose Oviedo-Sifuentes, no remand is warranted at this time. The Clerk is directed to issue a briefing

schedule to address any remaining issues that were not addressed in our prior opinion. As to the other petitioners who have appealed under Fifth Circuit No. 03-41492, to-wit, Laura Salazar-Regino, Teodulo Cantu-Delgadillo, Daniel Carrizales-Per-ez, Manuel Sandoval-Herrera, Raul Hernandez Pantoja, Cesar Lucio, Práxedis Rodriguez, and Nohemi Rangel-Rivera, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further consideration in light of Lopez.