UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ruben FLORES, also known as Q, Defendant-Appellant, 538 F. App'x 572

PER CURIAM: The attorney appointed to represent Ruben Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Flores has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Flores’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Flores’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief, for an extension of time, and for appointment of counsel or the continuation of self-representation is DENIED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.