UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Edy Guilmar CHILEL-SOTO, also known as Edy Chilel Soto-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant, 541 F. App'x 488

PER CURIAM: Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Edy Guilmar Chilel-Soto raises an argument that he correctly concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562 n. 28 (5th Cir.2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013) (No. 12-10695), in which this court con-eluded that the generic, contemporary

definitions of “statutory rape” and “sexual abuse of a minor” do not include the age-differential requirement that Chilel-Soto asserts is required. The appellant’s motion for

summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.