UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Lauro Arturo TREVINO, Sr., Defendant-Appellant, 597 F. App'x 282

PER CURIAM: The attorney appointed to represent Lauro Arturo Trevino, Sr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Trevino has not filed a response. During the pendency of this appeal, Trevino has been released from custody and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein.

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007). Counsel’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Pursuant to 5th Cir.

R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.