UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin ALARCON-AGUILERA, Defendant-Appellant, 617 F. App'x 285

PER CURIAM: The attorney appointed to represent Martin Alarcon-Aguilera has moved for leave to withdraw and has Sled a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir.2011). Alarcon-Aguilera has not Sled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment- that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2. Pursuant to 5th Ciu. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.