UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel DURAN-ARIAS, Defendant-Appellant, 624 F. App'x 245

PER CURIAM: Miguel Duran-Arias appeals the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry. Duran-Arias argues that his attorney performed ineffectively at sentencing by failing to present the real reason Duran-Arias illegally reentered the United States and by failing to object at sentencing. Because the record is not sufficiently developed to allow for a fair consideration of these claims, we decline to consider them on direct appeal without prejudice to any right Duran-Arias has to raise them on collateral review. See United States v.

Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 123, 190 L.Ed.2d 94 (2014). AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.