Source: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date: 1897-05-04
Jurisdiction: United States
Docket: No. 555
Citation: 81 F. 1003
Opinion
PER CURIAM. The facts established by the evidence are not sufficient to warrant the finding that Samuel B. Newman, Sr., had actual notice of W. J. Davis’ equity in the lands in controversy, nor to warrant the presumption that Mrs. Mattie L. Newman, the mortgagee, knew, or ought to have known, of any such equity. The decree appealed from is affirmed.