INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Appellant, v. Carl T. HOWE, Appellee, 179 F.2d 239

PER CURIAM. This cause was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; And it appearing that the questions of fact involved were submitted to the jury under appropriate instructions pertaining thereto, compare Myers v. John Hancock Mut. Life Insurance Co., 108 Ohio St. 175, 181 through 183, 140 N.E. 504, that the verdict of the jury is amply supported by the evidence, and that there is no prejudicial error in the rulings of the trial judge or in his instructions to the jury; It is therefore ordered that the judgment •of the District Court be and is affirmed.