James P. FREE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PETERS, III and Neil Hartigan, Respondents-Appellees, 44 F.3d 435

PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of petitioner’s “EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION”, respondents’ “MOTION FOR

SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE OF DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF RULE 60(

b) RELIEF AND OBJECTION TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION”, petitioner’s “OPPOSITION OF JAMES P. FREE, JR. TO THE STATE’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR

SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE OF DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF RULE 60(

b) RELIEF”, and petitioner’s “SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT FOR STAY OF EXECUTION AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO THE STATES’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR

SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE”, IT IS ORDERED that the district court’s order of December 2, 1994 is SUMMARILY AFFIRMED. See Williams v. Chrans, 42 F.3d 1137 (7th Cir.1994). The motion for a stay of execution is MOOT.