Clark BEHLER, Plaintiff in error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 9 F.2d 1016

PER CURIAM. The questions presented on this writ of error are .practically identical with those raised in the case of Chapman v. United States, 9 F.(2d) 790, decided by this court December 2, 1925, and no separate opinion is necessary. On the strength of the opinion in Chapman v. United States, the judgment here is affirmed. .