PER CURIAM. South Dakota inmate James Wilbourn appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal without prejudice of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Additionally, Wilbourn has filed numerous motions requesting appointment of counsel, relief on the merits, and leave to conduct discovery.
In a September 1, 2005 order, the district court dismissed Wilbourn’s complaint without prejudice upon (1) determining Wilbourn had “three strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), was not under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and had not paid the district court filing fee; and (2) opining Wilbourn had failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We affirm the district court’s finding Wilbourn had “three-strikes” within the meaning of
section 1915(g). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Martin v. Neb. Dep’t of Corr. Servs., 242 F.3d 376 (8th Cir.2000) (unpublished per curiam) (affirming district court’s “three strikes” finding under § 1915(g)). Because Wilbourn’s IFP complaint was not properly before the district court, we decline to address the court’s alternative holdings. The district court’s preservice dismissal without prejudice is affirmed, and Wilb-ourn’s pending motions are denied as moot. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). . The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. .
Section 1915(
g) of Title 28, United States Code provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this
section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.