Paul LOVE, Appellant, v. CURATORS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI; BTi Employee Screening Services; Bill Mitchell, Appellees, 230 F. App'x 639

PER CURIAM. Paul Love appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action based on the court’s determination that the parties had reached a settlement agreement. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the parties reached a settlement agreement at their August 23, 2005 meeting, and that the terms of the agreement are embodied in the transcript of the meeting. See Chaganti & Assocs., P.C. v.

Nowotny, 470 F.3d 1215, 1221 (8th Cir.2006) (appeals court reviews for clear error district court’s finding that settlement agreement existed), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2977, — L.Ed.2d - (2007) (No. 06-1377). In addition, we find nothing in the record to support Love’s unsubstantiated claim that he was coerced into the agreement. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.