Suzanne SCHMIDT, Appellant, v. DAYTON HUDSON, INC., Appellee, 26 F. App'x 602

PER CURIAM. Suzanne Schmidt brought a Title VII case against Dayton Hudson, Inc., asserting claims of hostile work environment, retaliation, and constructive discharge. The District Court granted

summary judgment in favor of Dayton Hudson. Schmidt appeals, arguing that the evidence in the

summary-judgment record shows various disputed issues of material fact that preclude

summary judgment. Having reviewed the record de novo in light of the briefs and oral arguments and applying well-established

summary-judgment standards, we are satisfied the District Court correctly ruled that Dayton Hudson was entitled to

summary judgment. We conclude that as a matter of law Schmidt has failed to make a case for trial on any of her claims. Finding no flaw in the District Court’s thorough and well-reasoned memorandum and order, we affirm the final judgment entered by that court against Schmidt and in favor of Dayton Hudson. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable Kathleen A. Jaudzemis, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska, presiding with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).