Bobby L. FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Blaine WELSH; et al., Defendants- Appellees, 189 F. App'x 675

MEMORANDUM A review of the record and appellant’s April 24, 2006 response indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.