Erick Ivan Duran CORTE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent, 190 F. App'x 561

MEMORANDUM Respondent’s motion for

summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard); see also Falcon Carñche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2003); Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291 F.3d 594, 602-03 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.