Ralesh Prakash CHAUBE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent, 222 F. App'x 627

MEMORANDUM Respondent’s unopposed motion for

summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.