Michael W. WATKINS; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ronald M. GEORGE, Justice, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, City of Sacramento, California; et al., Defendants-Appellees, 227 F. App'x 614

MEMORANDUM The court has reviewed appellees’ motion for

summary affirmance, appellants’ opposition thereto, the record and appellants’ opening brief. The questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The district court properly dismissed appellants’ complaint. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.