Michael James HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. WALKER, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees, 317 F. App'x 689

MEMORANDUM A review of the record and appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The district court properly dismissed the action without prejudice because appellant admitted in his complaint that he failed to exhaust administrative remedies. See Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.