UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Mauricio AVELAR, Defendant-Appellant, 363 F. App'x 501

MEMORANDUM Antonio Mauricio Avelar appeals from the 18-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for plain error, United States v. Hammons, 558 F.3d 1100, 1103 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm. Avelar contends that the district court procedurally erred when it failed to address applicable

section 3553 factors and the reasons for imposing a particular sentence. The record reflects that the district court adequately explained the reasons for the sentence, including stating the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc); Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 358-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.