Pierre GENEVIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eduardo AGUIRRE; et al., Defendants-Appellees, 372 F. App'x 767

MEMORANDUM Pierre Genevier appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil rights action alleging that the defendants wrongfully denied him various benefits that he was entitled to as a refugee, and other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action after Genevier repeatedly failed to file an amended complaint that complied with the district court’s previous orders and ignored numerous warnings that failure to do so would result in dismissal. See id. at 1260-61 (discussing factors to be considered before dismissing under Rule 41(

b) for failure to comply with a court order). Genevier’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. Genevier’s motion to take judicial notice is denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.