UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Felipe ALMANZA, Defendant-Appellant, 395 F. App'x 374

MEMORANDUM Felipe Almanza appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Almanza contends that the district court erred by imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence, failing to consider all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(

a) factors to impose an individualized sentence, and treating the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory. These contentions are foreclosed. See Dillon v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2691-93, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.