John HARDNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony LAMARQUE, Warden; et al., Defendants-Appellees, 398 F. App'x 305

MEMORANDUM The district court properly granted

summary judgment because the uncontroverted evidence shows that defendants’ alleged acts or omissions did not cause Hardney’s untimely filing of a habeas petition. See Vandelft v. Moses, 31 F.3d 794, 797-98 (9th Cir.1994) (prisoner alleging inadequate access to courts must show how inadequate access caused actual injury); see also Glenn K Jackson Inc. v. Roe, 273 F.3d 1192,1202 (9th Cir.2001) (“[A] district court may grant

summary judgment on any legal ground the record supports.”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Hardney’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.