Eduardo ROMERO-ZEPEDA and Elvia Romero, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent, 469 F. App'x 512

MEMORANDUM Petitioners Eduardo Romero-Zepeda and Elvia Romero, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of then* application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their U.S. citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v.

Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir.2009). Petitioners’ contention that the IJ failed to properly consider and weigh all evidence of hardship does not raise a color-able due process claim. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.