Nehemiah ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. CATLETT, Sergeant; et al., Defendants-Appellees, 470 F. App'x 546

MEMORANDUM California state prisoner Nehemiah Robinson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants delayed assigning him to a lower bunk, confiscated his cane, denied him pain medication, and retaliated against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Nunes v. Ashcroft, 375 F.3d 805, 807 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Robinson’s post-judgment motion because Robinson failed to show any newly discovered evidence, intervening change in controlling law, clear error, or manifest injustice. See id. at 807-OS (setting forth grounds justifying reconsideration). Robinson’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.