UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin SALDANA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant, 512 F. App'x 727

MEMORANDUM Martin Saldana-Vasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Saldana-Vasquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Saldana-Vasquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.