UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benito LEDESMA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant, 608 F. App'x 501

MEMORANDUM Benito Ledesma-Sanchez appeals from the 64-month sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Ledesma-Sanchez contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(

B) by failing to make an express ruling about whether he had a prior conviction for robbery that would support a 16-level enhancement. The district court expressly determined that the 16-level enhancement validly applied. Accordingly, the court satisfied the requirements of Rule 32. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 32(i)(3)(B). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.