Raheem MUHAMMAD, Appellant v. Kim DINE, United States Capitol Police, et al., Appellees, 602 F. App'x 542

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed March 26, 2014 be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s complaint and civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a). See, e.g., Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.