Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the, opinion of the court. This case comes before the court upon a certificate of divis-r ion from the Circuit Court for the District of Michigan. Upon opening the record, it is evident that the whole case has been sent up in this form.
It is, indeed, divided into points, but most of them are merely hypothetical, and might never have arisen or required a decision upon them in the Circuit Court. ' For whether they would or would not arise depended altogether upon the decision of points which precede them in the statement. .This subject has been frequently before the court, 'and we have repeatedly said, that, under such certificates of division, we have no jurisdiction. Without attempting to enumerate the cases, it is sufficient on the present occasion to refer to White v. Turk and others, 12 Peters, 238, and The United States v.
Stone, 14 Peters, 524, which are decisive of this case. It is unnecessary, therefore, to examine the printed arguments that have been filed, as the case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Order. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Michigan, and on the points and questions on which the judges of the said Circuit Court were opposed in opinion, and Which were certified to this court for its opinion, agreeably to the act of Congress in such case made and provided, and was argued by counsel.
And it appearing to this court, upon an inspection of the said transcript, that no point in the case within the meaning of the act of Congress has been certified to this court, it is thereupon now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be. and the same is hereby dismissed, and that this cause be and the same is hereby remanded to the said Circuit Court, to be proceeded in according to law.