PAUL KICHINKO v. E. W. SCARBOROUGH, as Director of the State Beverage Department, 155 Fla. 358

PER CURIAM: The record and the briefs in this cause have been.examined and the peremptory writ of mandamus is awarded on authority of Singer, et al., v. Scarborough, decided this date, a like question being involved in both cases. ■It is so ordered. BUFORD, C. J., TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.