Per Curiam. Affirmed. See Atwater v. State, 233 So.3d 1276, 2018 WL 267081 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 2, 2018) (holding that a motion under rule 3.216(b), Fla. R. Crim., P., for a competency evaluation as a “precautionary measure” did not then require “a mandatory competency hearing” under rule 3.210(b), Fla. R. Crim. P.). Lewis, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.
Loading document…
Kenneth CHRISTIAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee, 233 So. 3d 1290 | CaseLite