PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court under its conflict certiorari jurisdiction as provided by
Article V,
Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and Fla.App. Rule 4.5 c.(6). After hearing argument, we are of the opinion that the writ of certiorari heretofore granted in this cause should now be discharged. Accordingly, the writ of certio-rari is discharged. OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.