AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 794 So. 2d 457

PER CURIAM. We have for consideration the quadrennial report of The Florida Bar Criminal Procedure Rules Committee proposing rules changes in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c)(3). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c), the proposed changes were submitted to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its approval, and the Board approved the changes unanimously. The proposed changes were published for comments and several were filed.

The Committee asks us to amend Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.025, 3.030, 3.111, 3.125, 3.190, 3.191, 3.213, 3.217, 3.218, 3.219, 3.692, 3.800, 3.851, 3.986, 3.9.87, 3.989, 3.993, and 3.994. After reviewing the Committee’s proposals, considering the comments filed by interested persons, and hearing oral argument, we adopt the Committee’s proposed changes with the exceptions noted below.

We decline to adopt the proposed change to subdivision (d)(4) (waiver of counsel) of rule 3.111, Providing Counsel for Indigents, which would remove language requiring two attesting witnesses to all out-of-court waivers of counsel. At oral argument, the Public Defender of the Second Judicial Circuit expressed concern regarding defendants’ execution of out-of-court waivers without a formal procedure. Since all waivers of counsel must be voluntary, we conclude that the Public Defender’s concerns have merit. Therefore, we reject the amendment to subdivision (d)(4).

However, we do adopt the new subdivision (e)(2) of rule 3.111, which conforms the criminal rules to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(5) which requires that defense counsel not be allowed to withdraw until substitute counsel has been obtained or appointed, or a statement has been filed with the appellate court that the appellant has exercised the right to self-representation.

We also do not adopt the proposed amendment to subdivision (h)(4) of rule 3.190, Pretrial Motions, which would add language requiring motions to suppress evidence to be made “a reasonable time” before trial unless good cause is demonstrated for the delay. Numerous problems that could arise from the use of the “reasonable time” language were raised in the comments and discussed at oral argument. The Chair of the Committee, the Honorable O.H.

Eaton, Jr., Circuit Judge of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit Court, agreed that because the trial court judges of this State already have the inherent authority to manage their dockets in such a manner as to address the time for filing of motions to suppress, “criminal justice won’t come to a standstill” if this proposed rule change is not adopted. In light of this inherent authority, we see no reason to adopt the proposed amendment at this time.

We adopt all the proposed amendments to rule 3.851, Collateral Relief After Death Sentence Has Been Imposed, with minor modifications and the addition of a provision to new subdivision (d), Incompetency to Proceed in Capital Collateral Proceedings, as explained below. The addition of the language “And Affirmed on Direct Appeal,” to the title and subdivision (a), Scope, is intended to remove ambiguity that could result when a death sentence is imposed but thereafter is reduced to a life sentence on direct appeal. We have modified the proposed amendments to subdivisions (

b) and (

c) to delete references to time periods which are no longer necessary. New subdivision (d), Incompetence to Proceed in Capital Collateral Proceedings, is added in response to this Court’s decision in Carter v. State, 706 So.2d 873, 876 n. 3 (Fla.1997). In that case, the Court held that “a judicial determination of competency is required when there are reasonable grounds to believe that a capital defendant is incompetent to proceed in postconviction proceedings in which factual matters are at issue, the development or resolution of which require the defendant’s input.” Carter, 706 So.2d at 875.

In drafting proposed subdivision (d), the Committee looked to rules 3.210-3.212, which govern trial-level competency determinations. However, it appears that the Committee overlooked the need for a provision similar to rule 3.211(d), which specifies the written findings that must be contained in an expert’s report to the trial court. We believe that the expert report should contain detailed findings similar to those required by rule 3.211(d). Accordingly, we have added a provision modeled after that rule.

We also have made minor changes to subdivisions (d)(1) and (d)(4) to make clear that the rule applies in collateral proceedings. We, adopt the following amendments as proposed by the Committee. Rule 3.025, State and Prosecuting Attorney Defined, is adopted to clarify that when terms such as “state,” “state attorney,” “prosecutor,” and “prosecution” are used in the rules they should be construed to mean the prosecuting authority representing the state. Rule 3.030, Service of Pleadings and Papers, is amended to add subdivision (b)(5) which regulates the electronic service of pleadings and papers on parties.

The amendment is modeled after Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.080(b)(5), which addresses service by facsimile. The amendment to subdivision (

d) recognizes that electronic filing is permissible. Rule 3.191, Speedy Trial, is amended to require demands for speedy trial and notice of expiration of speedy trial time to be separately captioned and filed so as to prevent these time-triggering pleadings from being buried in pleadings addressing unrelated matters. Additionally, the rule is amended to require service of a copy of the pleading on the prosecuting authority. Rules 3.213, 3.217, 3.218 and 3.219 are amended to change the reference from the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services to the Department of Children and Family Services.

Rules 3.692, Petition to Seal or Expunge, and 3.989, Affidavit, Petition, and Order to Expunge or Seal Forms, are amended to require that a petition seeking to seal or expunge nonjudicial criminal history records be accompanied by a certificate of eligibility issued to the petitioner by Florida Department of Law Enforcement. The amendments conform these rules to the requirements of State v. D.H.W., 686 So.2d 1331 (Fla.1996).

Rule 3.800, Correction, Reduction, and Modification of Sentences, is amended to provide that sentences that fail to grant proper credit for time served, when proper credit is determinable from the record without the necessity of an evidentiary hearing, are illegal and correctable under subdivision (a). The purpose of this amendment is to conform subdivision (

a) to this Court’s opinion in State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998). Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The committee notes are offered for explanation only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. The amendments shall become effective January 1, 2001, at 12:01 a.m. It is so ordered. WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. APPENDIX RULE 3.025.

STATE AND PROSECUTING ATTORNEY DEFINED Whenever the terms “state,” “state attorney,” “prosecutor,” “prosecution,” “prosecuting officer,” or “prosecuting attorney” are used in these rules, they shall be construed to mean the prosecuting authority representing the state of Florida. Committee Notes 2000 Adoption. This provision is new. Its purpose is to include the Office of Statewide Prosecution as a prosecuting authority under these rules. No substantive changes are intended by the adoption of this rule. RULE 3.030. SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND PAPERS (

a) Service; When Required. Every pleading subsequent to the initial indictment or information on which a defendant is to be tried unless the court otherwise orders, and every order not entered in open court, every written motion unless it is one as-toabout which a hearing ex parte is authorized, and every written notice, demand, and similar paper shall be served on each party; however, nothing herein shall be construed to require that a plea of not guilty shall be in writing. (

b) Same; How Made. When under these-r-ules service is required or permitted to be made on a party represented by an attorney, the service shall be made on the attorney unless service on the party is ordered by the court. Service on the attorney or on a party shall be made by delivering a copy to the party or by mailing it to the party’s last known address, or, if no address is known, by leaving it with the clerk of the court who shall place it in the court file.

Delivery of a copy within this rule shall mean: (1) handing it to the attorney or to the party; or (2) leaving it at the attorney’s office with the secretary or other person in charge; or (3) if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place therein; or (4) if the office is closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at the person’s usual place of abode with a family member above 15 years of age and informing that person of the contents.

Service by mail shall be deemedconsidered complete upon mailing^ or (5) transmitting it electronically to each party with a cover sheet indicating the sender’s name, bar number, firm, address, telephone number, facsimile or modem number, and the number of pages transmitted. Electronic service occurs when transmission of the last page is complete. Service by delivery or electronic transmission after 5:00 p.m. shall be deemed to have been made on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. (

c) Filing. All original papers, copies of which are required to be served on parties, must be filed with the court either before service or immediately thereafter. (

d) Filing with the Court Defined. The filing of pleadings and other papers with the court as required by these rules shall be made by filing them with the clerk of the court, except that the judge may permit the papers to be filed with him or her, in which event the judge shall note thereon the filing date and transmit them to the office of the clerk. Unless any rule expressly provides to the contrary, filing of pleadings and other papers with the court may be made by electronic transmission provided for and in accordance with the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration. (

e) Certificate of Service. When any attorney shall in substance certify: I do certify that a copy (copies) hereof (has) (have) been furnished to (here insert name or names) by (delivery) (mail) this — ==—day—of— — -1-9 on.... (date).... Attorney the certificate shall be taken as prima facie proof of service in compliance with all rules of court and law. Committee Notes 1968 Adoption. Taken from the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. 1972 Amendment. Same as prior rule; (

a) amended by deleting reference to trial on affidavit. 2000 Amendment. Fraudulent manipulation of electronically transmitted service should be considered contemptuous and dealt with by appropriate sanctions by the court. RULE 3.111. PROVIDING COUNSEL TO INDIGENTS (

a) When Counsel Provided. A person entitled to appointment of counsel as provided herein shall have counsel appointed when the person is formally charged with an offense, or as soon as feasible after custodial restraint, or at the first appearance before a committing magistrate, whichever occurs earliest. (

b) Cases Applicable.

(1) Counsel shall be provided to indigent persons in all prosecutions for offenses punishable by imprisonment (or by incarceration in a juvenile corrections institution) including appeals from the conviction thereof. Counsel does not have to be provided to an indigent person in a prosecution for a misdemeanor or violation of a municipal ordinance if the judge, prior tobefore trial, files in the cause a statement in writing that the defendant will not be imprisoned if convicted.

(2) Counsel may be provided to indigent persons in all proceedings arising from the initiation of a criminal action against a defendant, including postconviction proceedings and appeals therefrom, extradition proceedings, mental competency proceedings, and other proceedings that are adversary in nature, regardless of the designation of the court in which they occur or the classification of the proceedings as civil or criminal.

(3) Counsel may be provided to a partially indigent person on request, provided that the person shall defray that portion of the cost of sudwepresentation and the reasonable costs of investigation as he or she is able without substantial hardship to the person or the person’s family, as directed by the court. (4) “Indigent” as- ■ used- herein shall mean a person who is unable to pay for the services of an attorney, including costs of investigation, without substantial hardship to the person or the person’s family; “partially indigent” as used herein shall mean a person unable to pay more than a portion of the fee charged by an attorney, including costs of investigation, without substantial hardship to the person or the person’s family.

(5) The court shall, prior toBefore appointing a public defender, the court shall: (

A) inform the accused that, if the public defender is appointed, a lien for the services rendered by the public defender may be imposed under

section 27.56, Florida Statutes; (

B) make inquiry into the financial status of the accused in a manner not inconsistent with the guidelines established by

section 27.52, Florida Statutes. The accused shall respond to the inquiry under oath; (

C) require the accused to execute an affidavit of insolvency in the format provided by

section 27.52, Florida Statutes. (

c) Duty of Booking Officer. In addition to any other duty, the officer who commits a defendant to custody has the following duties:

(1) The officer shall immediately advise the defendant: (

A) of the right to counsel; (

B) that, if the defendant is unable to pay a lawyer, one will be provided immediately at no charge.

(2) If the defendant requests counsel or advises the officer that he or she cannot afford counsel, the officer shall immediately and effectively place the defendant in communication with the (office of) public defender of the circuit in which the arrest was made.

(3) If the defendant indicates that he or she has an attorney or is able to retain an attorney, the officer shall immediately and effectively place the defendant in communication with the attorney or the Lawyer Referral Service of the local bar association.

(4) The public defender of each judicial circuit may interview a defendant when contacted by, or on behalf of, a defendant who is, or claims to be, indigent as defined by law. (

A) If the defendant is in custody and reasonably appears to be indigent, the public defender shall tender such advice as is indicated by the facts of the case, seek the setting of a reasonable bail, and otherwise represent the defendant pending a formal judicial determination of indigency. (

B) If the defendant is at liberty on bail or otherwise not in custody, the public defender shall elicit from the defendant only such the information from the-defendant asthat may be reasonably relevant to the question of indigency and shall immediately seek a formal judicial determination of indigency. If the court finds the defendant indigent, it shall immediately appoint counsel to represent the defendant. (

d) Waiver of Counsel.

(1) The failure of a defendant to request appointment of counsel or the announced intention of a defendant to plead guilty shall not, in itself, constitute a waiver of counsel at any stage of the proceedings.

(2) A defendant shall not be deemed considered to have waived the assistance of counsel until the entire process of offering counsel has been completed and a thorough inquiry has been made into both the accused’s comprehension of that offer and the accused’s capacity to make a knowing and intelligent waiver. Before determining whether the waiver is knowing and intelligent, the court shall advise the defendant of the disadvantages and dangers of self-representation.

(3) Regardless of the defendant’s legal skills or the complexity of the case, the court shall not deny a defendant’s unequivocal request to represent himself or herself, if the court makes a determination of record that the defendant has made a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel.

(4) A waiver of counsel made in court shall be of record; a waiver made out of court shall be in writing with not less than 2 attesting witnesses. The witnesses shall attest the voluntary execution thereof.

(5) If a waiver is accepted at any stage of the proceedings, the offer of assistance of counsel shall be renewed by the court at each subsequent stage of the proceedings at which the defendant appears without counsel. (

e) Withdrawal of Defense Counsel After Judgment and Sentence. The attorney of record for a defendant in a criminal proceeding shall not be relieved of any duties, nor be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record, except with approval of the lower tribunal on good cause shown on written motion, until after: (1) the filing of: (

A) a notice of appeal; (

B) a statement of judicial acts to be reviewed, if a transcript will require the expenditure of public funds; (

C) directions to the clerk, if necessary; and (

D) a designation of that portion of the reporter’s transcript that supports the statement of judicial acts to be reviewed, if a transcript will require expenditure of public funds; or (2) substitute counsel has been obtained or appointed, or a statement has been filed with the appellate court that the appellant has exercised the right to self-representation. In publicly funded cases, the public defender for the local circuit court shall be appointed initially until the record is transmitted to the appellate court; or (2)(3) the time has expired for filing of a notice of appeal, and no such notice has been filed.

Orders allowing withdrawal of counsel are conditional, and counsel shall remain of record for the limited purpose of representing the defendant in the lower tribunal regarding any sentencing error that the lower tribunal is authorized to address during the pendency of the direct appeal pursuant to Florida-Rule of Criminal Pro-eedureunder rule 3.800(b)(2). Committee Notes 1972 Adoption.

Part 1 of the ABA Standard relating to providing defense services deals with the general philosophy for providing criminal defense services and while the committee felt that the philosophy should apply to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, the standards were not in such form to be the subject of that particular rule. Since the standards deal with the national situation, contained in them were alternative methods of providing defense services, i.e., assigned counsel vs. defender system; but, Florida, already having a defender system, need not be concerned with the assigned counsel system. (

a) Taken from the first sentence of ABA Standard 5.1. There was considerable discussion within the committee concerning the time within which counsel should be appointed and who should notify defendant’s counsel. The commentary in the ABA Standard under 5.1a, b, convinced the committee to adopt the language here contained. (

b) Standard 4.1 provides that counsel should be provided in all criminal cases punishable by loss of liberty, except those types where such punishment is not likely to be imposed. The committee determined that the philosophy of such standard should be recommended to the Florida Supreme Court. The committee determined that possible deprivation of liberty for any period makes a case serious enough that the accused should have the right to counsel. (

c) Based on the recommendation of ABA Standard 5.1b and the commentary thereunder which provides that implementation of a rule for providing the defendant with counsel should not be limited to providing a means for the accused to contact a lawyer. (

d) From standard 7.2 and the commentaries thereunder. 1980 Amendment. Modification of the existing rule (the addition of (b)(5)(A)-(C)) provides a greater degree of uniformity in appointing counsel to indigent defendants. The defendant is put on notice of the lien for public defender services and must give financial information under oath. A survey of Florida judicial circuits by the Committee on Representation of Indigents of the Criminal Law

Section (1978-79) disclosed the fact that several circuits had no procedure for determining indigen-cy and that there were circuits in which no affidavits of insolvency were executed (and no legal basis for establishing or collecting lien monies). 1992 Amendment. In light of State v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, 569 So.2d 439 (Fla.1990), in which the supreme court pronounced that motions seeking belated direct appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel should be filed in the trial court pursuant to rule 3.850, the committee recommends that rule 3.111(

e) be amended to detail with specificity defense counsel’s duties to perfect an appeal prior to withdrawing after judgment and sentence. The present provision merely notes that such withdrawal is governed by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(3). 1998 Amendment. The amendments to (d)(2)-(3) were adopted to reflect State v. Bowen, 698 So.2d 248 (Fla.1997), which implicitly overruled Cappetta v. State, 204 So.2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967), rev’d on other grounds, 216 So.2d 749 (Fla.1968). See Fitzpatrick v. Wainwright, 800 F.2d 1057 (11th Cir.1986), for a list of factors the court may consider.

See also McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168, 104 S.Ct. 944, 79 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984), and Savage v. Estelle, 924 F.2d 1459 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied 501 U.S. 1255, 111 S.Ct. 2900, 115 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1991), which suggest that the defendant’s right to self-representation is limited when the defendant is not able or 'willing to abide by the rules of procedure and courtroom protocol. 2000 Amendment. This rule applies only to judicial proceedings and is inapplicable to investigative proceedings and matters. See rule 3.010. RULE 3.125. NOTICE TO APPEAR (

a) Definition. Notice to appear means, «Unless indicated otherwise, notice to appear means a written order issued by a law enforcement officer in lieu of physical arrest requiring a person accused of violating the law to appear in a designated court or governmental office at a specified date and time. (

b) By Arresting Officer.

If a person is arrested for an offense declared to be a misdemeanor of the first or second degree or a violation, or is arrested for violation of a municipal or county ordinance triable in the county, and demand to be taken before a magistrate is not made, notice to appear may be issued by the arresting officer unless: (1) the accused fails or refuses to sufficiently identify himself or herself or supply the required information; (2) the accused refuses to sign the notice to appear; (3) the officer has reason to believe that the continued liberty of the accused constitutes an unreasonable risk of bodily injury to the accused or others; (4) the accused has no ties with the jurisdiction reasonably sufficient to assure the accused’s appearance or there is substantial risk that the accused will refuse to respond to the notice; (5) the officer has any suspicion that the accused may be wanted in any jurisdiction; or (6) it appears that the accused previously has previously failed to respond to a notice or a summons or has violated the conditions of any pretrial release program. (

c) By Booking Officer. If the arresting officer does not issue notice to appear because of one of the exceptions listed in subdivision (b)(-l-)--through (b)(6) and takes the accused to police headquarters, the booking officer may issue notice to appear if the officer determines that there is a likelihood that the accused will appear as directed, based on a reasonable investigation of the accused’s: (1) residence and length of residence in the community; (2) family ties in the community; (3) employment record; (4) character and mental condition; (5) past record of convictions; or (6) past history of appearance at court proceedings. (

d) How and When Served. If notice to appear is issued, it shall be prepared in quadruplicate. The officer shall deliver 1 copy of the notice to appear to the arrested person and the person, to secure release, shall give a written promise to appear in court by signing the 3 remaining copies: 1 to be retained by the officer and 2 to be filed with the clerk of the court. These 2 copies shall be sworn to by the arresting officer before a notary public or a deputy clerk. If notice to appear is issued pursuant tounder subdivision (b), the notice shall be issued immediately upon arrest.

If notice to appear is issued pursuant tounder subdivision (c), the notice shall be issued immediately upon completion of the investigation. The arresting officer or other duly authorized official shall-then shall release from custody the person arrested from custody. (

e) Copy to the Clerk of the Court. With the sworn notice to appear, the arresting officer shall file with the clerk a list of witnesses and their addresses and a list of tangible evidence in the cause. One copy shall be retained by the officer and 2 copies shall be filed with the clerk of the court. (

f) Copy to State Attorney. The clerk shall deliver 1 copy of the notice to appear and

schedule of witnesses and evidence filed therewith to the state attorney. (

g) Contents. If notice to appear is issued, it shall contain the: (1) name and address of the accused; (2) date of offense; (3) offense(

s) charged — by statute and municipal ordinance if applicable; (4) counts of each offense; (5) time and place that the accused is to appear in court; (6) name and address of the trial court having jurisdiction to try the offense(

s) charged; (7) name of the arresting officer; (8) name(

s) of any other person(

s) charged at the same time; and (9) signature of the accused. (

h) Failure to Appear. If a person signs a written notice to appear and fails to respond to the notice to appear, a warrant of arrest shall be issued pursuant tounder rule 3.121. (

i) Traffic Violations Excluded. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the operation of a traffic violations bureau, the issuance of citations for traffic violations, or any procedure pursuant-founder

chapter 316, Florida Statutes. (

j) Rules and Regulations. Rules and regulations of procedure governing the exercise of authority to issue notices to appear shall be established by the chief judge of the circuit. (

k) Procedure by Court.

(1) Upon the appearance of When the accused appears before the court pursuant tounder the requirements of the notice to appear, the court shall advise the defendant as set forth in rule 3.130(b), and the provisions of that rule shall apply. The accused at such appearance may elect to waive the right to counsel and trial and enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere by executing the waiver form contained on the notice to appear, and the court may enter judgment and sentence in the cause.

(2) In the event the defendant enters a plea of not guilty, the court may set the cause for jury or nonjury trial on the notice to appear pursuant tounder the provisions of rules 3.140 and 3.160. Upon the setting-&fWhen the court sets a trial date by the court, the clerk shall, without further praecipe, issue witness subpoenas to the law enforcement officer who executed the notice to appear and to the witnesses whose names and addresses appear on the list filed by the officer, requiring their attendance at trial. (

I) Form of Notice to Appear and

Schedule of Witnesses and Evidence. The notice to appear and

schedule of witnesses and evidence shall be in substantially the following form: IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR _ COUNTY, FLORIDA NOTICE TO APPEAR Agency Case # STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF _ In the name of_County, Florida: The undersigned certifies that he or she has just and reasonable grounds to believe, and does believe, that: On fee — =====—day—of— -? 19- .... (date)...., at _ ( )a.m. ()p.m. _ _(Last Name)_(First) (M.I.) -(Aliases) -(Street — City and State) _(Date and Place of Birth) _(phone) __ (Race/Sex) ._. (Height) _(Weight) __.(Hair) _ (Eyes) _(Scars/Marks) -(Occupation) _ (Place of Employment) _ (Employment Phone) _(Complexion) _(Driver’s License #) _ (Yr./St.) -(Social Security #) at_(Location) in_ County, Florida, committed the following offense(s): (1) - (2)-in violations of section(s): _:_ ( ) State Statute ( ) Municipal Ord.

DID (Narrative):_ -(Name of Officer) -(ID)-(Agency) [ ] Mandatory appearance in court, -(Location) - (Month Day), 19 on .... (date)...., at_ ( )a.m. ( )p.m. [ ] You need not appear in court, but must comply with instructions on back. CO-DEFENDANTS: 1. -(Name DOB Address) [ ] Cited [ ] Jailed 2. -(Name DOB Address) [ ] Cited [ ] Jailed I AGREE TO APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE DESIGNATED ABOVE TO ANSWER THE OFFENSE CHARGED OR TO PAY THE FINE SUBSCRIBED.

I UNDERSTAND THAT SHOULD I WILLFULLY FAIL TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT AS REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE TO APPEAR, I MAY BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND A WARRANT FOR MY ARREST SHALL BE ISSUED. Signature of Defendant I swear the above and reverse and attached statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Complainant Agency or Department Sworn to and subscribed before me this - day — of —. , 19 -on .... (date).

Notary Public, State of Florida WAIVER INFORMATION If you desire to plead guilty or nolo contendere (no contest) and you need not appear in court as indicated on the face of this notice, you may present this notice at the county court named on the reverse of this page. From (Date)_(date). -(Hour) to -- —(Date)-(date)...., -(Hour) and pay a fine of - dollars in cash, money order, or certified check. The waiver below must be completed and attached. Read carefully.

Your failure to answer this summons in the manner subscribed will result in a warrant being issued on a separate and additional charge. “In consideration of my not appearing in court, I the undersigned, do hereby enter my appearance on the affidavit for the offense charged on the other side of this notice and waive the reading of the affidavit in the above named cause and the right to be present at the trial of said action.

I hereby enter my plea of Guilty [ ] or Nolo Contendere [ ], and waive my right to prosecute appeal or error proceedings. “I understand the nature of the charge against me; I understand my right to have counsel and waive this right and the right to a continuance. I waive my right to trial before a judge or jury. I plead Guilty [ ] or Nolo Contendere [ ] to the charge, being fully aware that my signature to this plea will have the same effect as a judgment of this court.” Total Fine and Cost_ Defendant Signature_ Address- IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR _ COUNTY, FLORIDA

SCHEDULE OF WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE FOR NOTICE TO APPEAR Agency Case # (Last Name First M.I. Abases) (Address) (Date of Notice to Appear) .... (date of notice to appear).... Of- fense(s): (1)-(2)- Date-of-Notice-te-Appear-(2)- TANGIBLE EVIDENCE: (If none, write “None”) Item: - Obtained from (person and/or place): __ first received by: _ given to: _ WITNESSES: (If none, write “None”) # 1 Name: _ Res. Tel. No. _Address: _ Bus. Tel. No. _Business: _ Testimony: _ # 2 Name: Res. Tel. No. Address: Bus. Tel. No. Business: Testimony: _ # 3 Name: Res. Tel. No. Address: Bus. Tel. No.

Business: Testimony: _ I certify that the foregoing is a complete list of witnesses and evidence known to me. Investigating Officer Agency Committee Notes 1992 Amendment. The amendment deletes subdivision (

k) and reletters subdivisions (

l) and (m). The ebmination of subdivision (

k) will entitle individuals charged with criminal violations to the same discovery, without regard to the nature of the charging instrument. As amended, persons charged by way of a notice to appear can obtain the same discovery as persons charged by way of either an information or an indictment. In this regard the committee also has proposed amendments to rule 3.220(b)(1), (b)(2), (e)(1), and (h)(1) to change the reference from “indictment or information” to “charging document.” RULE 3.190. PRETRIAL MOTIONS (

a) In General. Every pretrial motion and pleading in response to a motion shall be in writing and signed by the party making the motion or the attorney for the party. This requirement may be waived by the court for good cause shown. Each motion or other pleading shall state the ground or grounds on which it is based. A copy shall be served on the adverse party. A certificate of service must accompany the filing of any pleading. (

b) Motion to Dismiss; Grounds. All defenses available to a defendant by plea, other than not guilty, shall be made only by motion to dismiss the indictment or information, whether the same shall relate to matters of form, substance, former acquittal, former jeopardy, or any other defense. (

c) Time for Moving to Dismiss. Unless the court grants further time, the defendant shall move to dismiss the indictment or information either before or upe-nat arraignment. The court in its discretion may permit the defendant to plead and thereafter to file a motion to dismiss at a time to be set by the court. Except for objections based on fundamental grounds, every ground for a motion to dismiss that is not presented by a motion to dismiss within the time hereinabove provided fer-shall be taken to have-been-considered waived. — However, the court may at any time entertain a motion to dismiss on any of the following grounds:

(1) The defendant is charged with an offense for which the defendant has been pardoned.

(2) The defendant is charged with an offense offer which the defendant has previously has been placed in jeopardy.

(3) The defendant is charged with an offense for which the defendant has previously has been granted immunity.

(4) There are no material disputed facts and the undisputed facts do not establish a prima facie case of guilt against the defendant. The facts on which suehthe motion is based should be specifically alleged specifically and the motion sworn to. (

d) Traverse or Demurrer. The state may traverse or demur to a motion to dismiss that alleges factual matters. Factual matters alleged in a motion to dismiss under subdivision (c)(4) of this rule shall be deemedconsidered admitted unless specifically denied by the state in the traverse. The court may receive evidence on any issue of fact necessary to the decision on the motion. A motion to dismiss under subdivision (c)(4) of this rule shall be denied if the state files a traverse that, with specificity, denies under oath the material fact or facts alleged in the motion to dismiss. The demurrer or traverse shall be filed a reasonable time before the hearing on the motion to dismiss. (

e) Effect of Sustaining a Motion to Dismiss. If the motion to dismiss is sustained, the court may order that the defendant be held in custody or admitted to bail for a reasonable specified time pending the filing of a new indictment or information. If a new indictment or information is not filed within the time specified in the order, or within such additional time as the court may allow for good cause shown, the defendant, if in custody, shall be discharged therefrom, unless some other charge justifies a continuation in custody.

If the defendant has been released on bail, the defendant and the sureties shall be exonerated; if money or bonds have been deposited as bail, suehthe money or bonds shall be refunded. (

f) Order Dismissing. For the purpose of construing

section 924.07(1), Florida Statutes (1969), the statutory term “order quashing” shall be taken and held to mean “order dismissing.” (

g) Motion for Continuance.

(1) Definition. A continuance within the meaning of this rule is the postponement of a cause for any period of time.

(2) Cause. The court oOn motion of the state or a defendant or on its own motion, the court may grant a continuance, in its discretion for good cause shown grant a continuance.

(3) Time for Filing. A motion for continuance may be made only before or at the time the case is set for trial, unless good cause for failure to so apply is shown or the ground for the motion arose after the cause was set for trial.

(4) Certificate of Good Faith. A motion for continuance shall be accompanied by a certificate of the movant’s counsel that the motion is made in good faith.

(5) Affidavits. The party applying for a continuance may file affidavits in support of the motion, and the adverse party may file counter-affidavits in opposition to the motion. (

h) Motion to Suppress Evidence in Unlawful Search. (1)Grounds. A defendant aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure may move to suppress anything so obtained for use as evidence because: (

A) the property was illegally seized without a warrant; (

B) the warrant is insufficient on its face; (

C) the property seized is not thatthe property described in the warrant; (

D) there was no probable cause for believing the existence of the grounds on which the warrant was issued; or (

E) the warrant was illegally executed.

(2) Contents of Motion. Every motion to suppress evidence shall clearly-state clearly the particular evidence sought to be suppressed, the reasons for suppression, and a general statement of the facts on which the motion is based.

(3) Hearing. Before hearing evidence, the court shall determine if the motion is legally sufficient. If it is not, the motion shall be denied. If the court hears the motion on its merits, the defendant shall present evidence supporting the defendant’s position and the state may offer rebuttal evidence.

(4) Time for Filing. The motion to suppress shall be made before trial unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the court may entertain the motion or an appropriate objection at the trial. (i)Motion to Suppress a Confession or Admission Illegally Obtained.

(1) Grounds. On motion of the defendant or on its own motion, the court shall suppress any confession or admission obtained illegally from the defendant.

(2) Time for Filing. The motion to suppress shall be made prior tobefore trial unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the court in its discretion may entertain the motion or an appropriate objection at the trial. (3)Hearing. The court shall receive evidence on any issue of fact necessary to be decided in order to rule on the motion. (

j) Motion to Take Deposition to Perpetuate Testimony.

(1) After the filing of an indictment or information on which a defendant is to be tried-is-filed, the defendant or the state may apply for an order to perpetuate testimony. The application shall be verified or supported by the affidavits of credible persons that a prospective witness resides beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the court or may be unable to attend or be prevented from attending a trial or hearing, that the witness’s testimony is material, and that it is necessary to take the deposition to prevent a failure of justice.

The court shall order a commission to be issued to take the deposition of the witnesses to be used in the trial and that any nonprivileged designated books, papers, documents, or tangible objects,-not privileged-,' be produced at the same time and place. If the application is made within 10 days before the trial date, the court may deny the application.

(2) If the defendant or the state desires to perpetuate the testimony of a witness living in or out of the state whose testimony is material and necessary to the case, the same proceedings shall be followed as provided in the preceding subdivision (i)(l), but the testimony of the witness may be taken before an official court reporter, transcribed by the reporter, and filed in the trial court.

(3) If the deposition is taken on the application of the state, the defendant and the defendant’s attorney shall be given reasonable notice of the time and place set for the deposition. The officer having custody of the defendant shall be notified of the time and place and shall produce the defendant at the examination and keep the defendant in the presence of the witness during the examination. A defendant not in custody may be present at the examination, but the failure to appear after notice and tender of expenses shall constitute a waiver of the right to be present.

The state shall pay to the defendant’s attorney and to a defendant not in custody the expenses of travel and subsistence for attendance at the examination. The state shall make available to the defendant for examination and use at the deposition any statement of the witness being deposed that is in the possession of the state and that the state would be required to make available to the defendant if the witness were testifying at trial.

(4) The application and order to issue the commission may be made either in term time or in vacation. The commission shall be issued at a time to be fixed by the court.

(5) Except as otherwise provided, the rules governing the taking and filing of oral depositions, the objections thereto, the issuing, execution, and return of the commission, and the opening of the depositions in civil actions shall apply in criminal cases.

(6) No deposition shall be used or read into evidence when the attendance of the witness can be procured. If the court determines that any person whose deposition has been taken is absent because of procurement, inducement, or threats of any person on behalf of the state or of the defendant or of any person on the defendant’s behalf, the deposition shall not be read in evidence on behalf of the defendant. (

k) Motion to Expedite. UpoOn motion by the state, the court, in the exercise of its discretion, shall take into consideration the dictates of sections 825.106 and 918.0155, Florida Statutes (1995). Committee Notes 1968 Adoption, (

a) New; devised by committee. (

b) Substantially the same as

section 909.02, Florida Statutes, except changes name of “motion to quash” to “motion to dismiss.” This conforms to the terminology of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The statute authorizing the state to appeal from certain orders,

section 924.07, Florida Statutes, should be amended by substituting the words “motion .to dismiss” for “motion to quash.” (

c) Combines the substance of sections 909.01 and 909.06, Florida Statutes. Subdivision (4) affords a new remedy to an accused. Although there is now a conclusive presumption of probable cause once an indictment or information is filed (see Sullivan v. State, 49 So.2d 794 (Fla.1951)), it is felt that this rule is necessary. Primarily, this procedure will permit a pretrial determination of the law of the case when the facts are not in dispute. In a sense, this is somewhat similar to

summary judgment proceedings in civil cases, but a dismissal under this rule is not a bar to a subsequent prosecution. (

d) New; based on Marks v. State, 115 Fla. 497, 155 So. 727 (1934), and what is generally regarded as the better practice. Hearing provision based on federal rule 41(e). (

e) Combines federal rule 12(b)(5) and

section 909.05, Florida Statutes. With reference to the maximum time that a defendant will be held in custody or on bail pending the filing of a new indictment or information, the trial court is given discretion in setting such time as to both the indictment and information. This proposal differs from

section 909.05, Florida Statutes, with reference to the filing of a new indictment in that the statute requires that the new indictment be found by the same grand jury or the next grand jury having the authority to inquire into the offense. If the supreme court has the authority to deviate from this statutory provision by court rule, it seems that the trial court should be granted the same discretion with reference to the indictment that it is granted concerning the information.

The statute is harsh in that under its provisions a person can be in custody or on bail for what may be an unreasonable length of time before a grand jury is required to return an indictment in order that the custody or bail be continued. (g)

(1) This subdivision is almost the same as

section 916.02(1), Florida Statutes. (g)

(2) This subdivision is almost the same as

section 916.02(2), Florida Statutes. (g)

(3) This subdivision is almost the same as

section 916.03, Florida Statutes. (g)

(4) This subdivision rewords a portion of

section 916.04, Florida Statutes. (g)

(5) This subdivision rewords

section 916.07, Florida Statutes. (

h) Same as federal rule 41(

e) as to the points covered. (

i) This rule is based on 38-144-11 of the Illinois Code of Criminal Procedure and federal rule 41(e). (

j) This subdivision rewords and adds to federal rule 14. It covers the subject matter of

section 918.02, Florida Statutes. (

k) This rule is almost the same as federal rule 13, with provision added for trial by affidavit. (

l) Substantially same as

section 916.06, Florida Statutes, with these exceptions: application cannot be made until indictment, information, or trial affidavit is filed; application must be made at least 10 days before trial; oral deposition in addition to written interrogatories is permissible. 1972 Amendment. Subdivision (

h) is amended to require the defendant to specify the factual basis behind the grounds for a motion to suppress evidence. Subdivision (

l) is amended to permit the state to take depositions under the same conditions that the defendant can take them. Former subdivisions (

j) and (

k) transferred to rules 3.150, 3.151, and 3.152. Subdivisions (l)and (

m) renumbered (

j) and (

k) respectively. Otherwise, same as prior rule. 1977 Amendment. This amendment resolves any ambiguity in the rule as to whether the state must file a general or a specific traverse to defeat a motion to dismiss filed under the authority of rule 3.190(c)(4). See State v. Kemp, 305 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). The amendment clearly now requires a specific traverse to specific material fact or facts. 1992 Amendment. The amendments, in addition to gender neutralizing the wording of the rule, make a minor grammatical change by substituting the word “upon” for “on” in several places. The amendments also delete language from subdivision (

a) to eliminate from the rule any reference as to when pretrial motions are to be served on the adverse party. Because rule 3.030 addresses the service of pleadings and papers, such language was removed to avoid confusion and reduce redundancy in the rules. RULE 3.191. SPEEDY TRIAL (

a) Speedy Trial without Demand. Except as otherwise provided by this rule, and subject to the limitations imposed under subdivisions (

e) and (f), every person charged with a crime by indictment or information shall be brought to trial within 90 days if the crime charged is a misdemeanor, or within 175 days if the crime charged is a felony. If trial is not commenced within these time periods, the defendant shall be entitled to the appropriate remedy as set forth in subdivision (p). The time periods established by this subdivision shall commence when the person is taken into custody as defined under subdivision (d).

A person charged with a crime is entitled to the benefits of this rule whether the person is in custody in a jail or correctional institution of this state or a political subdivision thereof or is at liberty on bail or recognizance or other pretrial release condition. This subdivision shall cease to apply whenever a person files a valid demand for speedy trial under subdivision (b). (

b) Speedy Trial upon Demand. Except as otherwise provided by this rule, and subject to the limitations imposed under subdivisions (

e) and (g), every person charged with a crime by indictment or information shall have the right to demand a trial within 60 days, by filing with the court having jurisdiction and serving on the state -attorney a separate pleading entitled “Demand for Speedy Triak,” and serving a copy on the prosecuting authori-ÍZ-

(1) No later than 5 days from the filing of a demand for speedy trial, the court shall hold a calendar call, with notice to all parties, for the express purposes of announcing; in open court; receipt of the demand and of setting the case for trial.

(2) At the calendar call the court shall set the case for trial to commence at a date no less than 5 days nor more than 45 days from the date of the calendar call.

(3) The failure of the court to hold such a calendar call on a demand that has been properly filed and served shall not interrupt the running of any time periods under this subdivision.

(4) If the defendant has not been brought to trial within 50 days of the filing of the demand, the defendant shall have the right to the appropriate remedy as set forth in subdivision (p). (

c) Commencement of Trial. A person shall be deemedconsidered to have been brought to trial if the trial commences within the time herein provided. The trial is deemedconsidered to have commenced when the trial jury panel for that specific trial is sworn for voir dire examination or, upon waiver of a jury trial, when the trial proceedings begin before the judge. (

d) Custody. For purposes of this rule, a person is taken into custody (1) when the person is arrested as a result of the conduct or criminal episode that gave rise to the crime charged, or (2) when the person is served with a notice to appear in lieu of physical arrest. (

e) Prisoners outside Jurisdiction. A person who is in federal custody or incarcerated in a jail or correctional institution outside the jurisdiction of this state or a subdivision thereof, and who is charged with a crime by indictment or information issued or filed under the laws of this state, is not entitled to the benefit of this rule until that person returns or is returned to the jurisdiction of the court within which the Florida charge is pending and until written notice of this factthe person’s return is filed with the court and served on the prosecutor. For suehthese persons, the time period under subdivision (

a) commences on the date the last act required under this subdivision occurs. For suehthese persons the time period under subdivision (

b) commences when the demand is filed so long as the acts required under this subdivision occur prior'tobefore the filing of the demand. If the acts required under this subdivision do not precede the filing of the demand, then the demand is invalid and shall be stricken upon motion of the prosecuting attorney. Nothing hereinabove- statedin this rule shall affect a prisoner’s right to speedy trial under sections 941.45-941.50, Florida Statutes (1979)law. (

f) Consolidation of Felony and Misdemeanor. When a felony and a misdemeanor are consolidated for disposition in circuit court, the misdemeanor shall be governed by the same time period applicable to the felony. (

g) Demand for Speedy Trial; Accused Is Bound. A demand for speedy trial binds the accused and the state. No demand for speedy trial shall be filed or served unless the accused has a bona fide desire to obtain a trial sooner than otherwise might be provided. A demand for speedy trial shall be deemedconsidered a pleading that the accused is available for trial, has diligently investigated the case, and is prepared or will be prepared for trial within 5 days.

A demand filed by an accused who has not diligently investigated the case or who is not timely prepared for trial shall be stricken as invalid on motion of the prosecuting attorney. A demand may not be withdrawn by the accused except on order of the court, with consent of the state or on good cause shown.

Good cause for continuances or delay on behalf of the accused thereafter shall not thereafter-include nonreadiness for trial, except as to matters that may arise after the demand for trial is filed and that reasonably could not reasonably have been anticipated by the accused or his -or-her-counsel for the accused. A person who has demanded speedy trial, who thereafter is not prepared for trial, is not entitled to continuance or delay except as provided in this rule. (

h) Notice of Expiration of Time for Speedy Trial; When Timely. A notice of expiration of speedy trial time shall be timely if filed and served on or after the expiration of the periods of time for trial provided for herein; ■ bin this rule. However, a notice of expiration of speedy trial time filed before expiration of the period of time for trial is invalid and shall be stricken on motion of the prosecuting attorney. (

i) When Time May Be Extended. The periods of time established by this rule may be extended, provided the period of time sought to be extended has not expired at the time the extension was procured.

Such aAn extension may be procured by: (1) upefr-stipulation, announced to the court or signed in proper person or by counsel, by the party against whom the stipulation is sought to be enforced; (2) by^-written or recorded order of the court on the court’s own motion or motion by either party in exceptional circumstances as hereafter defined in subdivision (3) by — written or recorded order of the court with good cause shown by the accused; or (4) by^-written or recorded order of the court for a period of reasonable and necessary delay resulting from proceedings including but not limited to an examination and hearing to determine the mental competency or physical ability of the defendant to stand trial, for hearings on pretrial motions, for appeals by the state, and for trial of other pending criminal charges against the accused. (

j) Delay and Continuances; Effect on Motion. If trial of the accused does not commence within the periods of time established by this rule, a pending motion for discharge shall be granted by the court unless it is shown that: (1) a time extension has been ordered under subdivision (

i) and that extension has not expired; (2) the failure to hold trial is attributable to the accused, a codefendant in the same trial, or their counsel; (3) the accused was unavailable for trial under subdivision (k); or (4) the demand referred to in subdivision (

g) is invalid. If the court finds that discharge is not appropriate for reasons under subdivisions (j)(2), (8), or (4), the pending motion for discharge shall be denied, provided, however, that trial shall be scheduled and commence within 90 days of a written or recorded order of denial. (

k) Availability for Trial. A person is unavailable for trial if the person or the person’s counsel fails to attend a proceeding whereat which either’s presence is required by these rules, or the person or counsel is not ready for trial on the date trial is scheduled. A person who has not been available for trial during the term provided for hereinin this rule is not entitled to be discharged. No presumption of nonavailability attaches, but if the state objects to discharge and presents any evidence tending to show nonavailability, the accused then must by competent proof establish, by competent proof, availability during the term. (?) Exceptional Circumstances. As permitted by subdivision (

i) of this rule, the court may order an extension of the time periods provided under this rule when exceptional circumstances are shown to exist. Exceptional circumstances shall not include general congestion of the court’s docket, lack of diligent preparation, failure to obtain available witnesses, or other avoidable or foreseeable delays. Exceptional circumstances are those that, as a matter of substantial justice to the accused or the state or both, require an order by the court.

SuehThese circumstances include: (1) unexpected illness, unexpected incapacity, or unforeseeable and unavoidable absence of a person whose presence or testimony is uniquely necessary for a full and adequate trial; (2) a showing by the state that the case is so unusual and so complex, due tebecause of the number of defendants or the nature of the prosecution or otherwise, that it is unreasonable to expect adequate investigation or preparation within the periods of time established by this rule; (3) a showing by the state that specific evidence or testimony is not available despite diligent efforts to secure it, but will become available at a later time; (4) a showing by the accused or the state of necessity for delay grounded on developments that could not have been anticipated and that will materially will affect the trial; (5) a showing that a delay is necessary to accommodate a codefendant, when there is reason not to sever the cases is order-to proceed promptly with trial of the defendant; and (6) a showing by the state that the accused has caused major delay or disruption of preparation of proceedings, as by preventing the attendance of witnesses or otherwise. (m)Effect of Mistrial; Appeal; Order of New Trial.

A person who is to be tried again or whose trial has been delayed by an appeal by the state or the defendant shall be brought to trial within 90 days from the date of declaration of a mistrial by the trial court, the date of an order by the trial court granting a new trial, the date of an order by the trial court granting a motion in arrest of judgment, or the date of receipt by the trial court of a mandate, order, or notice of whatever form from as appellate- or other reviewing court that makes possible a new trial for the defendant, whichever is last in time.

If a defendant is not brought to trial within the prescribed time periods, the defendant shall be entitled to the appropriate remedy as set forth in subdivision (p). (

n) Discharge from Crime; Effect. Discharge from a crime under this rule shall operate to bar prosecution of the crime charged and of all other crimes on which trial has not commenced nor conviction obtained nor adjudication withheld and that were or might have been charged as a result of the same conduct or criminal episode as a lesser degree or lesser included offense. (

o) Nolle Prosequi; Effect. The intent and effect of this rule shall not be avoided by the state by entering a nolle prosequi to a crime charged and by prosecuting a new crime grounded on the same conduct or criminal episode or otherwise by prosecuting new and different charges based on the same conduct or criminal episode, whether or not the pending charge is suspended, continued, or is the subject of entry of a nolle prosequi. (

p) Remedy for Failure to Try Defendant within the Specified Time.

(1) No remedy shall be granted to any defendant under this rule until the court has made the required inquiry under subdivision (j).

(2) The defendant may-r-aAt any time after the expiration of the prescribed time period, the defendant may file a separate pleading entitled “Notice of Expiration of Speedy Trial Time,” and serve a copy on the prosecuting authority notice of expiration-of-speedy trial-time.

(3) No later than 5 days from the date of the filing of a notice of expiration of speedy trial time, the court shall hold a hearing on the notice and, unless the court finds that one of the reasons set forth in subdivision (

j) exists, shall order that the defendant be brought to trial within 10 days. A defendant not brought to trial within the 10-day period through no fault of the defendant, on motion of the defendant or the court, shall be forever discharged from the crime. Committee Notes 1972 Amendment. Same as prior rule. The

schedule is omitted as being unnecessary. 1977 Amendment. An appeal by the state from an order dismissing the case constitutes an interlocutory appeal and should be treated as such. The additional phrase removes any ambiguities in the existing rule. 1980 Amendment. (a)(1). Speedy Trial without Demand. 1. Prisoners in Florida institutions are now treated like any other defendant [formerly (b)(1) ]. 2. Federal prisoners and prisoners outside Florida may claim the benefit of this subdivision once special prerequisites are satisfied under (b)(1). 8.

Before a court can discharge a defendant, the court must make complete inquiry to ensure that discharge is appropriate. (a)(2). Speedy Trial upon Demand. 1. Trial cannot be scheduled within 5 days of the filing of the demand without the consent of both the state and the defendant. 2. Before a court can discharge a defendant, the court must make complete inquiry to ensure that discharge is appropriate. 3. Prisoners in Florida are now treated like any other defendant [formerly (b)(2) ]. 4.

Federal prisoners and prisoners outside Florida may claim the benefit of this subdivision once special prerequisites are satisfied under (b)(1). (a)(3). Commencement of Trial. 1. Minor change in language to reflect case law. (a)(4). Custody. [NEW] 1. Custody is defined in terms tantamount to arrest. This definition was formerly contained in (a)(1). 2. Where a notice to appear is served in lieu of arrest, custody results on the date the notice is served. (b)(1). Prisoners outside Jurisdiction. [NEW] 1.

Prisoners outside the jurisdiction of Florida may claim benefit under (a)(1) and (a)(2) after the prisoner returns to the jurisdiction of the court where the charge is pending and after the prisoner files and serves a notice of this fact. 2. As an alternative, certain prisoners may claim the benefit of sections 941.45-941.50, Florida Statutes (1979). 3. Former (b)(1) is repealed. (b)(2). [NEW] 1. Where a misdemeanor and felony are consolidated for purposes of trial in circuit court, the misdemeanor is governed by the same time period applicable to the felony.

To claim benefit under this provision, the crimes must be consolidated before the normal time period applicable to misdemeanors has expired. 2. Former (b)(2) is repealed. (b)(3). Repealed and superseded by (b)(1). (c). Demand for Speedy Trial. 1. The subdivision recognizes that an invalid (spurious) demand must be stricken. 2. The subdivision now puts a 5-day limit on the time when a defendant must be prepared. (d)(1). Motion for Discharge. 1. Under the amended provision, a prematurely filed motion is invalid and may be stricken. (d)(2). When Time May Be Extended. 1.

The terms “waiver,” “tolling,” or “suspension” have no meaning within the context of the subdivision as amended. The subdivision addresses extensions for a specified period of time. 2. Except for stipulations, all extensions require an order of the court. 3. The term “recorded order” refers to stenographic recording and not recording of a written order by the clerk. (d)(3). Delay and Continuances. 1. Even though the normal time limit has expired under (a)(1) or (a)(2), a trial court may not properly discharge a defendant without making a complete inquiry of possible reasons to deny discharge.

If the court finds that the time period has been properly extended and the extension has not expired, the court must simply deny the motion. If the court finds that the delay is attributable to the accused, that the accused was unavailable for trial, or that the demand was invalid, the court must deny the motion and

schedule trial within 90 days. If the court has before it a valid motion for discharge and none of the above circumstances are present, the court must grant the motion. (e). Availability for Trial. 1. Availability for trial is now defined solely in terms of required attendance and readiness for trial. (f). Exceptional Circumstances. 1. The 2 extension limit for unavailable evidence has been discarded. 2. The new trial date paragraph was eliminated because it simply was unnecessary. (g). Effect of Mistrial; Appeal; Order of New Trial. 1.

Makes uniform a 90-day period within which a defendant must be brought to trial after a mistrial, order of new trial, or appeal by the state or defendant. (h)(1). Discharge from Crime. 1. No change. (h)(2). Nolle Prosequi. 1. No change. 1984 Amendment. (a)(1). Repeals the remedy of automatic discharge from the crime and refers instead to the new subdivision on remedies. (a)(2). Establishes the calendar call for the demand for speedy trial when filed. This provision, especially sought by prosecutors, brings the matter to the attention of both the court and the prosecution.

The subdivision again repeals the automatic discharge for failure to meet the mandated time limit, referring to the new subdivision on remedies for the appropriate remedy. (i). The intent of (i)(4) is to provide the state attorney with 15 days within which to bring a defendant to trial from the date of the filing of the motion for discharge. This time begins with the filing of the motion and continues regardless of whether the judge hears the motion.

This subdivision provides that, upon failure of the prosecution to meet the mandated time periods, the defendant shall file a motion for discharge, which will then be heard by the court within 5 days. The court sets trial of the defendant within 10 additional days. The total 15-day period was chosen carefully by the committee, the consensus being that the period was long enough that the system could, in fact, bring to trial a defendant not yet tried, but short enough that the pressure to try defendants within the prescribed time period would remain.

In other words, it gives the system a chance to remedy a mistake; it does not permit the system to forget about the time constraints. It was felt that a period of 10 days was too short, giving the system insufficient time in which to bring a defendant to trial; the period of 30 days was too long, removing incentive to maintain strict docket control in order to remain within the prescribed time periods. The committee further felt that it was not appropriate to extend the new remedy provisions to misdemeanors, but only to more serious offenses. 1992 Amendment.

The purpose of the amendments is to gender neutralize the wording of the rule. In addition, the committee recommends the rule be amended to differentiate between 2 separate and distinct pleadings now referred to as “motion for discharge.” The initial “motion for discharge” has been renamed “notice of expiration of speedy trial time.” RULE 3.213. CONTINUING INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED, EXCEPT INCOMPETENCY TO PROCEED WITH SENTENCING: DISPOSITION (

a) Dismissal without Prejudice during Continuing Incompetency.

If at any time after 5 years after determining a person incompetent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation hearing when charged with a felony, or 1 year when charged with a misdemeanor, the court, after hearing, determines that the defendant remains incompetent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation hearing, that there is no substantial probability that the defendant will become mentally competent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation hearing in the foreseeable future, and that the defendant does not meet the criteria for commitment, it shall dismiss the charges against the defendant without prejudice to the state to refile the charges should the defendant be declared competent to proceed in the future. (

b) Commitment or Treatment during Continuing Incompetency.

If at any time after 5 years after determining a person incompetent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation hearing when charged with a felony, or 1 year when charged with a misdemeanor, the court, after hearing, determines that the defendant remains incompetent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation hearing, that there is no substantial probability that the defendant will become mentally competent to stand trial or proceed with a probation or community control violation hearing in the foreseeable future, and that the defendant does meet the criteria for commitment, the court shall dismiss the charges against the defendant and commit the defendant to the Department of Health — and Rehabilitative Children and Family Services for involuntary hospitalization or residential services solely under the provisions of law or may order that the defendant receive outpatient treatment at any other facility or service on an outpatient basis subject to the provisions of those statutes.

In the order of commitment, the judge shall order that the administrator of the facility notify the state attorney of the committing circuit no less than 30 days prior to the anticipated date of release of the defendant. If charges are dismissed pursuant to this subdivision, the dismissal shall be without prejudice to the state to refile the charges should the defendant be declared competent to proceed in the future. (

c) Applicability. This rule shall not apply to defendants determined to be incompetent to proceed with sentencing, which is provided in rule 3.214. Committee Notes 1980 Adoption. As to involuntary hospitalization, see

section 394.467(1), Florida Statutes (1979); as to involuntary admission to residential services, see

chapter 393, Florida Statutes (1979). (

b) This provision is meant to deal with the defendant who remains incompetent after 5 years, and who does meet the criteria for involuntary hospitalization. It provides that the criminal charges will be dismissed and the defendant will be involuntarily hospitalized. It further provides that the administrator of the facility must notify the state attorney prior to any release of a defendant committed pursuant to this subdivision. As to criteria for involuntary hospitalization, see

section 394.467(1), Florida Statutes (1979);. in case of retardation, see

chapter 393, Florida Statutes (1979). (

c) Since commitment criteria for a defendant determined to be incompetent to stand trial are the same as for civil hospitalization, there is no need to continue the difference between felony and misdemean- or procedure.

Section 916.14, Florida Statutes, makes the statute of limitations and defense of former jeopardy inapplicable to criminal charges dismissed because of incompetence of defendant to stand trial. 1988 Amendment. Title. The title has been amended to comply with changes in rule 3.210, but specifically excludes competency to proceed with sentencing, which is addressed in the new rule 3.214. (a)This provision was amended to reflect changes in rules 3.210 and 3.211.

New language is added which specifies that, if charges are dismissed under this rule, it is without prejudice to the state to refile if the defendant is declared competent to proceed in the future. Similar language was previously found in rule 3.214(d), but is more appropriate under this rule. (

b) This provision has been amended for the same reasons as (

a) above. (

c) This new provision specifically exempts this rule from being used against a defendant determined to be incompetent to be sentenced, which is now provided in the new rule 3.214. It is replaced by the new rule 3.214. 1992 Amendment. The purpose of the amendment is to gender neutralize the wording of the rule. Introductory Note Relating to Amendments to Rules 3.210 to 3.219. See notes following rule 3.210 for the text of this note. RULE 3.217. JUDGMENT OF NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY: DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANT (

a) Verdict of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity. When a person is found by the jury or the court not guilty of the offense or is found not to be in violation of probation or community control by reason of insanity, the jury or judge, in giving the verdict or finding of not guilty judgment, shall state that it was given for that reason. (

b) Treatment, Commitment, or Discharge after Acquittal. When a person is found not guilty of the offense or is found not to be in violation of probation or community control by reason of insanity, if the court shaR-then determines that the defendant presently meets the criteria set forth by law, the court shall commit the defendant to the Department of Health.and RehabilitativeChildren and Family Services or shall order outpatient treatment at any other appropriate facility or service on an-oulpatient basis, or shall discharge the defendant.

Any order committing the defendant or requiring outpatient treatment or other outpatient service shall contain: (1) findings of fact relating to the issue of commitment or other court-ordered treatment; (2) copies of any reports of experts filed with the court; and (3) any other psychiatric, psychological, or social work report submitted to the court relative to the mental state of the defendant. Committee Notes 1980 Adoption. (

a) Same substance as in prior rule. (

b) The criteria for commitment are set forth in

chapter 394, Florida Statutes. This rule incorporates those statutory criteria by reference and then restates the other alternatives available to the judge under former rule 3.210. See

section 912.18, Florida Statutes, for criteria.

(1) This subdivision is equivalent to rule 3.212(b)(2); see commentary to that rule. 1988 Amendment. The amendments to this rule provide for evaluation of a defendant found not guilty by reason of insanity in violation of probation or community control proceedings as well as at trial. The amendments further reflect 1985 amendments to

chapter 916, Florida Statutes. 1992 Amendment. The purpose of the amendment is to gender neutralize the wording of the rule. Introductory Note Relating to Amendments to Rules 3.210 to 3.219. See notes following rule 3.210 for the text of this note. RULE 3.218. COMMITMENT OF A DEFENDANT FOUND NOT GUILTY BY REASON OF INSANITY (

a) Commitment; 6-Month Report. The Department of Health and Rehabilita-tiveChildren and Family Services shall admit to an appropriate facility a defendant found not guilty by reason of insanity pursuant tounder rule 3.217 and found to meet the criteria for commitment for hospitalization and treatment and may retain and treat the defendant. No later than 6 months from the date of admission, the administrator of the facility shall file with the court a report, withand provide copies to all parties, which shall address the issues of further commitment of the defendant.

If at any time during the 6-month period, or during any period of extended hospitalization that may be ordered pursu-aat-tounder this rule, the administrator of the facility shall determine that the defendant no longer meets the criteria for commitment, the administrator shall notify the court by such a report withand provide copies to all parties. (

b) Right to Hearing if Committed upon Acquittal. The court shall hold a hearing within 30 days of the receipt of any suefc-report from the administrator of the facility on the issues raised thereby, and the defendant shall have a right to be present at the hearing. If, following the hearing? the court determines that the defendant continues to meet the criteria for continued commitment or treatment, the court shall order further commitment or treatment for a period not to exceed 1 year. The same procedure shall be repeated prior tobefore the expiration of each additional 1-year period in which the-defendant is retained by the facility. (

c) Evidence to Determine Continuing Insanity. Prior toBefore any hearing held pursuant-tounder this rule, the court may, on its own motion, and shall, on motion of counsel for the state or defendant, appoint no fewer than 2 nor more than 3 experts to examine the defendant relative to the criteria for continued commitment or placement of the defendant and shall specify the date by which suefathe experts shall report to the court on these issues withand provide copies to all parties. Committee Notes 1980 Adoption.

This provision provides for hospitalization of a defendant found not guilty by reason of insanity and is meant to track similar provisions in the rules relating to competency to stand trial and the complementary statutes. It provides for an initial 6-month period of commitment with successive 1-year periods; it provides for reports to the court and for the appointment of experts to examine the defendant when such hearings are necessary.

The underlying rationale of this rule is to make standard, insofar as possible, the commitment process, whether it be for incompetency to stand trial or following a judgment of not guilty by reason of insanity. For complementary statute providing for hospitalization of defendant adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity, see

section 912.15, Florida Statutes. 1988 Amendment. The amendments to this rule, including the title, provide for commitment of defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity in violation of probation or community control proceedings, as well as those so found at trial. The amendments farther reflect 1985 amendments to

chapter 916, Florida Statutes. Introductory Note Relating to Amendments to Rules 3.210 to 3.219. See notes following rule 3.210 for the text of this note. RULE 3.219. CONDITIONAL RELEASE (

a) Release Plan. The committing court may order a conditional release of any defendant who has been committed according to a finding of incompetency to proceed or an adjudication of not guilty by reason of insanity based on an approved plan for providing appropriate outpatient care and treatment. At such time asWhen the administrator shall determine outpatient treatment of the defendant to be appropriate, the administrator may file with the court, withand provide copies to all parties, a written plan for outpatient treatment, including recommendations from qualified professionals.

Such.aThe plan may be submitted by the defendant. The plan shall include: (1) special provisions for residential care, adequate supervision of the defendant, or both; (2) provisions for outpatient mental health services; and (3) if appropriate, recommendations for auxiliary services such as vocational training, educational services, or special medical care.

In its order of conditional release, the court shall specify the conditions of release based on the release plan and shall direct the appropriate agencies or persons to submit periodic reports to the court regarding the defendant’s compliance with the conditions of the release, and progress in treatment, withand provide copies to all parties. (

b) Defendant’s Failure to Comply. If at-any-thae-it appears at any time that the defendant has failed to comply with the conditions of release, or that the defendant’s condition has deteriorated to the point that inpatient care is required, or that the release conditions should be modified, the court may, after hearing, may modify the release conditions or, if the court finds the defendant meets the statutory criteria for commitment, may order that the defendant be recommitted to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative-Children and Family-Samces-for — fur-ther-treatment. (

c) Discharge. If at any time it is determined after hearing that the defendant no longer requires court-supervised follow-up care, the court shall terminate its jurisdiction in the cause and discharge the defendant. Committee Notes 1980 Adoption. This rule implements the prior statutory law permitting conditional release. For complementary statute providing for conditional release, see

section 916.17, Florida Statutes. 1988 Amendment. The amendments to this rule are designed to reflect amendments to rules 3.210, 3.211, and 3.218 as well as 1985 amendments to

chapter 916, Florida Statutes. (

b) This provision has been amended to permit the court to recommit a conditionally released defendant to HRS under the provisions of

chapter 916 only if the court makes a finding that the defendant currently meets the statutory commitment criteria found in

section 916.13(1), Florida Statutes. 1992 Amendment. The purpose of the amendment is to gender neutralize the wording of the rule. Introductory Note Relating to Amendments to Rule

[…]