Frank BALL, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Zita L. BALL, Appellee/Cross Appellant, 554 So. 2d 629

PER CURIAM. We affirm the equitable distribution of property but reverse the award of attorney’s fees to the wife. The financial status of the wife after the award of alimony, equitable distribution, and requirement that the husband pay joint debts leaves the parties with substantially equal resources. An award of attorney’s fees under these circumstances is an abuse of discretion. Blankenship v. Blankenship, 502 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). WALDEN and WARNER, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.